Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Mohd. Ayyub Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

Mohd. Ayyub Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)

Time-barred notice kills reassessment: ITAT quashes 147 proceedings for AY 2015-16 relying on Rajeev Bansal- For AY 2015-16, notice could have been issued only up to 31-03-2022, subject to ₹50 lakh escapement condition

Delhi ITAT allowed Assessee’s appeal &  quashed reassessment proceedings as being barred by limitation. Tribunal admitted additional legal ground under Rule 11, holding that validity of notice u/s 148 can be examined on admitted facts, relying on NTPC Ltd vs CIT. ITAT noted that Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Recorded Sales Cannot Be Taxed Again U/s 68; Additions Based Only on Third-Party Statement Deleted On-Money Addition for Flat Purchase Deleted; Builder’s General Statement Alone Not Enough Bogus Purchase Cases: Only Profit Element Taxable; 4% GP Addition Upheld Assessment on Amalgamated Company Held Void for Lack of Jurisdiction Penalty for Non-Compliance Deleted as Venial Breach Where Assessments Accepted Returned Income View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
January 2026
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031