This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Section 10(23BBA) exemption allowable to independent bodies constituted under Central/State/Provisional enactments
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Amirthakadeswaraswamy Devasthanam Vs ACIT (Madras High Court)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All High Courts, Madras High Court
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Amirthakadeswaraswamy Devasthanam Vs ACIT (Madras High Court)
Conclusion: The constituent temples function under the aegis of the HR&CE Act and the ‘body’ or ‘authority’ as referred to in Section 10(23BBA) would be the HR&CE department only. Moreover, the proviso to Section 10(23BBA) specifically excludes temples and other religious institutions functioning under the management of the ‘body’ or ‘authority’ from the scope of exemption, stating that they fell within the ambit of taxability. Thus, exemption under Section 10(23BBA) could be claimed only by the HR&CE dep...
Author Info
