Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Ammati Venkatachalapathisetty Satishkumar Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Ammati Venkatachalapathisetty Satishkumar Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore) Presumptive Taxation U/s 44AD – Cash Deposits Within Turnover Cannot Be Treated as Unexplained – Additions Based Only on Survey Statement Deleted – ITAT Bangalore Assessee, a retail trader running proprietary concern M/s Kumar Traders, declared income under presumptive scheme u/s 44AD. During survey proceedings, AO made multiple additions including ₹19 lakh cash deposits, ₹22.75 lakh investment in shop, ₹28.73 lakh income admitted during survey, and ₹22.75 lakh estimated profit based on alleged unaccoun...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930