Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ACIT Vs Bishan Jugraj Jain (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ACIT Vs Bishan Jugraj Jain (ITAT Mumbai) No Addition U/s 153A Without Incriminating Material – Penny Stock LTCG Addition Deleted in Unabated Year – ITAT Mumbai AO made addition u/s 68 & 69C alleging bogus LTCG from penny stock transactions based on investigation wing report and IDS declaration by family members, despite search u/s 132 not yielding any incriminating material against assessee. CIT(A) deleted additions holding that impugned year was unabated and no addition can be made u/s 153A without seized material. ITAT upheld CIT(A) observing that AO relied only on third-party in...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Tenancy Rights Transfer Taxable Only on Possession: STCG Addition Deleted JDA May Trigger Transfer- But No Double Taxation Allowed: Karnataka HC Relief CIT(A) Enhancement Quashed for No Notice – ITAT Restores LTCG Issues to AO No Penalty When Quantum Deleted: 270A Cannot Survive Without Addition Heavy Contract Payments by Trust Under Scanner: Matter Remanded for Verification View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930