This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Reopening after expiry of four years invalid if there was no failure on the part of assessee
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Garg Zevar Palace Pvt. Ltd Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2010-11
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Delhi
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Garg Zevar Palace Pvt. Ltd Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
Section 147 mandates that the case can only be reopened after expiry of four years only if there was a failure on the part of the assessee to fully and truly disclose all material facts necessary. The assessee has disclosed the fact of receipt of Rs.60,00,000/- towards the share capital in the regular return filed which has been scrutinized u/s 143(3). In the reasons recorded for reopening, the Assessing Officer has not mentioned anything with regard to failure on the part of the assessee to disclose all the material facts. This matter has been ex...
Author Info
