Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Abhinav Jindal HUF Vs ITO (Delhi High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Abhinav Jindal HUF Vs ITO (Delhi High Court)

In the landmark case of Abhinav Jindal HUF vs. ITO, the Delhi High Court has quashed notices issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, focusing on the validity of the sanction required for such reassessments. The court em-phasized that the approval must be obtained from the designated competent authority, as stipu-lated under Section 151 of the Act. The case involved notices issued for the Assessment Year 2015-16, which were invalid due to the sanction being granted by the Joint Commissioner of In-come Tax (JCIT),

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Author Bio

Mr.Kapil Goel B.Com(H) FCA LLB, Advocate Delhi High Court advocatekapilgoel@gmail.com, 9910272804 Mr Goel is a bachelor of commerce from Delhi University (2003) and is a Law Graduate from Merrut University (2006) and Fellow member of ICAI (Nov 2004). At present, he is practicing as an Advocate View Full Profile

My Published Posts

ITAT should not direct Remand on Legal & Factual Issues: Telangana HC Only Actual Income Earned from Bogus Sale & Purchase can be Taxed as Income Mechanical Approval Under Section 153D Without entry in Order Sheet is Fatal Non-Furnishing of Section 151 Approval Reasons Fatal to Reopening: SC Section 148 Notice Invalid; Should Have Followed Faceless Regime: Section 151A View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31