Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Bhavesh Karamshi Thakkar Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Bhavesh Karamshi Thakkar Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) Referral Expenses Not Hit by 194D- Referral Payments Not Insurance Commission – Tribunal Deletes 40(a)(ia) Addition Assessee, a qualified Chartered Accountant & LIC/Reliance Insurance Agent, filed return declaring ₹48,47,710. During scrutiny, AO noted sales promotion expenses of ₹29,96,390, out of which ₹28,50,093 was commission to 14 persons. Notices u/s 133(6) were issued & all parties confirmed receipt, some even appeared under summons u/s 131. Despite confirmations, AO disallowed 30% of commission (₹8,55,028) on adhoc basis c...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Pune ITAT: Housing Society Wins U/s 80P Deduction on Interest from Cooperative Banks No Double Taxation on Liability Write-Back: Delhi ITAT Deletes Section 41(1) Addition and Notional Interest Demand Copy-Paste Reasons Sink Reassessment: Delhi ITAT Quashes Reopening for Non-Application of Mind No 14A Disallowance Without Satisfaction, No Penalty on Debatable Issues Section 54 Relief Cannot Be Denied If Capital Gains Are Invested Before Filing Return u/s 139(4): Bangalore ITAT View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930