Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Bhavesh Karamshi Thakkar Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Bhavesh Karamshi Thakkar Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) Referral Expenses Not Hit by 194D- Referral Payments Not Insurance Commission – Tribunal Deletes 40(a)(ia) Addition Assessee, a qualified Chartered Accountant & LIC/Reliance Insurance Agent, filed return declaring ₹48,47,710. During scrutiny, AO noted sales promotion expenses of ₹29,96,390, out of which ₹28,50,093 was commission to 14 persons. Notices u/s 133(6) were issued & all parties confirmed receipt, some even appeared under summons u/s 131. Despite confirmations, AO disallowed 30% of commission (₹8,55,028) on adhoc basis c...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Reopening Fails on Both Counts: Invalid Sec 148A Notice and Time-Barred Sec 148 Render Assessment Void Coffee Income: Rule 7B Overrides Rule 7 – ITAT Remands for Segregation of Own vs Purchased Produce Duty Drawback Taxable Only on Receipt – ITAT Deletes Addition & U/s 270A Penalty Skill Development = “Education” – ITAT Allows Sec 11 Exemption to Charitable Trust No Penalty for Wrong Claim or Head of Income – ITAT Deletes Section 271(1)(c) Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930