Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Somnath Ramdas Jadhav Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Somnath Ramdas Jadhav Vs ITO (ITAT Pune) Information Emerged During Search Mandates Action u/s 153C, Not u/s 147: Pune ITAT Holds Reopening Invalid— Pune Tribunal examined the legality of reassessments framed u/s 147 r.w.s 144/144B & penalties u/s 271(1)(c). AO had reopened the assessments on the basis of information unearthed during a search u/s 132 at M/s Shri Renuka Mata Multistate Credit Society Ltd., where Assessee’s substantial cash deposits (Rs. 50,51,750/- for AY 2013-14) were revealed. Since Assessee failed to file returns or respond to notices, AO treated the cash deposits as...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Delay Condoned with Cost: ITAT Grants Fresh Chance, Slams Non-Compliance Section 153C Valid but Addition Fails: No Incriminating Material = No Deemed Dividend 870-Day Delay Not Condoned: ITAT Refuses Relief, Calls Out Negligence & “No Sufficient Cause” Wrong Section Claim Not Fatal: ITAT Remands Matter & Nullifies Penalty Penalty U/s 270A Quashed: No Specific Charge of “Misreporting” = No Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031