Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Mahender Merugu Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-2018
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Mahender Merugu Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad) In this case, the assessee challenged the validity of reassessment initiated under Section 148, arguing that the notice, though dated 31.03.2021, was actually issued on 01.04.2021 and therefore the amended provisions of Section 148A (introduced by Finance Act, 2021) should have been followed. The ITAT examined the dispatch records  and found that although the notice was dated 31.03.2021, it was handed over to the postal authorities only on 01.04.2021 at 14:48 hours, and even emailed later. Hence, the notice was effectively issued on or after 01.04.2021,...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Benami Veil Cannot Be Lifted by Clever Drafting: SC Restores Rejection of Plaint at Threshold Specific Performance Decree Does Not Die Automatically: SC Revives Execution Despite Delay in Deposit IBC Is Not a Recovery Shortcut: SC Rejects CIRP in Builder-Bank-Borrower Dispute No Signature, Yet Bound by Arbitration: SC Allows Collaborator to Invoke Arbitration Clause Entire Bank Deposits Cannot Be Taxed as Income – ITAT Restricts Addition to 2% in Renukamata Society Cases View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031