Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Prakash Varadaraj Vs ITO (Karnataka High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Prakash Varadaraj Vs ITO (Karnataka High Court) Faceless, baseless & now case-less — HC deletes reassessment chain with one click- Karnataka HC quashes faceless reassessment notices issued outside Section 151A procedure Petitioner, Prakash Varadaraj, represented by Sachin S Nayak., Advocate, challenged multiple digital notices, approvals & orders issued under the faceless assessment regime, relating to A.Y. 2016-17, including notices u/s 148A(b), 148, orders u/s 148A(d), reassessment order u/s 147 r.w.s. 144, penalty orders u/s 271F & 271(1)(c) &  consequential demand  noti...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Interest on Delayed Sales Tax, Service Tax & PF Payments Deductible; TDS Interest Disallowed: Patna ITAT Section 54F Deduction Allowed on Genuine House Purchase from In-Laws: Mumbai ITAT Pune ITAT Quashes Reassessment as Section 148A(b) & 148A(d) Reasons Differed Section 54 Relief Can’t Be Denied Merely Due to Section 50C Addition: Pune ITAT Delhi ITAT Deletes Penny Stock Addition; Suspicion Can’t Replace Evidence View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031