Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Admach Auto Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 9543/DEL/2019
Date of Judgement/Order : 18/12/2020
Related Assessment Year : 2009-10
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Admach Auto Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi)

Disposal Of Objection To Reasons In Assessment Order Itself Without Separate Speaking Order Makes Entire Reassessment Invalid

We have also gone through the objections dated 27.12.2016 filed by the assessee before the AO in which the assessee has specifically objected the initiation of proceedings u/s. 148 of the Act which is without jurisdiction, time barred and bad in law. We have also perused the assessment order and we find that the AO has disposed off the objections in the assessment order dated 28.11.2016 without passing a separate order which is the contrary to law an deserve to be cancelled on this count, in view of the decision of the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of GKN Driveshaft 259 ITR 19, which has been followed by various Benches of the ITAT, Delhi. The copy of one of the order of the ITAT, Delhi is attached in the paper book at page no. 19-44 which was passed in ITA No. 7372/Del/2019 (AY 2011-12) & Ors. in the case of Smt. Meena Gupta vs. ITO, Faridabad & Ors.

After going through the aforesaid order of the ITAT, Delhi Bench, we are of the view that there is force in the arguments advanced by the Ld. Counsel for the assessee on the issue of disposal of objections in the assessment order in not passing a separate order for disposing off the objections of the assessee, which is clear violation of the law laid down by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of GKN Driveshaft 259 ITR 19. Secondly, in the reasons, the AO has recorded that assessee has obtained the accommodation entry of Rs. 60 lacs in the name of 6 dummy / paper companies during the year under consideration, but finally made the addition of Rs. 50 lacs in the assessment order which also shows that AO has not applied his mind before recording the reasons in issuing the notice u/s. 148 of the Act. Therefore, the addition in dispute deserve to be cancelled. Keeping in view of the facts and circumstances of the case and respectfully following the precedent as aforesaid, we set aside the orders of the authorities below and quash the reopening of the assessment and addition in dispute stand deleted.

FULL TEXT OF THE ITAT JUDGEMENT

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Author Bio

Mr.Kapil Goel B.Com(H) FCA LLB, Advocate Delhi High Court advocatekapilgoel@gmail.com, 9910272804 Mr Goel is a bachelor of commerce from Delhi University (2003) and is a Law Graduate from Merrut University (2006) and Fellow member of ICAI (Nov 2004). At present, he is practicing as an Advocate View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Section 148 Notice Invalid; Should Have Followed Faceless Regime: Section 151A Notes of account do form part of Balance Sheet: Supreme Court Bombay HC Quashes AY 2013-14 Notices Post 31-03-2021, Rules TOLA Not Applicable PCIT Central not competent authority u/s 12AB(1) to pass order on registration of Trust No Denial of Concessional Tax Rate Due to Technical Glitch on ITBA portal View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031