This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Section 271(1)(c) Penalty Order Set Aside for Being Non-Speaking
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Marut Paper Products Pvt. Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Lucknow)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2016-17
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Lucknow
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Marut Paper Products Pvt. Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Lucknow)
Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) Cannot Be Confirmed by Non-Speaking Order—Matter Remanded
In Marut Paper Products Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT, Central Circle-1, Kanpur (ITA No. 393/LKW/2023; AY 2016-17), the ITAT Lucknow Bench examined the validity of an appellate order whereby the CIT(A) confirmed a penalty of ₹47,21,400 under Section 271(1)(c).
The assessee contended that the CIT(A) dismissed the appeal in limine for want of prosecution, without examining the merits of the penalty or passing a reasoned order. The Revenue left the matter to the discretion...

