Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Santosh Arun Kaspate Vs DCIT (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

Santosh Arun Kaspate Vs DCIT (ITAT Pune)

CIT(A) Cannot Dismiss Appeal Without Condoning Delay—Quantum and Penalty Matters Remanded

In Santosh Arun Kaspate v. DCIT, Circle-8, Pune (ITA Nos. 2198 & 2199/PUN/2025; AY 2013-14), the ITAT Pune Bench dealt with two connected appeals—one against the Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Late Audit Report Not Valid Ground to Deny 80IB Deduction Penalty Set Aside Because Notices Were Not Served as Required by Law IBC Section 7: SC Holds CIRP Admission Mandatory Once Debt & Default Proved; Society Intervention Denied ITAT Ahmedabad Deletes On-Money Additions; Loose Papers Insufficient Entire Bogus Purchase Disallowance Rejected When Books Not Rejected: ITAT Pune View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
January 2026
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031