Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Pinkydevi Mahendrakumar Jain Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2019-20
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

Pinkydevi Mahendrakumar Jain Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)

On-Money Addition Deleted in Platinum Mall Cases – Third-Party Pen Drive & Statements Not Sufficient – Sec 153C Addition Quashed – ITAT Mumbai

Based on a search in Rubberwala Group, AO invoked sec 153C and added ₹5 lakh alleging cash payment (“on-money”) for purchase of shop in Platinum Mall, relying mainly on a pen drive, excel sheets and statement of a third-party employee. CIT(A) confirmed the addition.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

ITAT Chandigarh Allows Sec 80P(2)(d) Deduction – 31 Oct Due Date Applies Due to Statutory Audit Adhoc 30% Expense Disallowance Deleted – No Specific Defects or Verification by AO: ITAT Chandigarh Penalty u/s 271C for Non-Deduction of TDS on Foreign LTC Upheld: ITAT Chandigarh Mere Third-Party Excel Sheet Insufficient for Section 69 Addition: ITAT Chandigarh ITAT Guwahati Quashes Reassessment Notice, Treats Loose Sheets as Dumb Documents, Deletes Protective Sec 69C Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
February 2026
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
232425262728