Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : State Bank of India Local Head Office Chandigarh Vs ACIT (TDS) (ITAT Chandigarh)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
State Bank of India Local Head Office Chandigarh Vs ACIT (TDS) (ITAT Chandigarh) ITAT upheld penalty of ₹17.23 lakh u/s 271C levied on the bank for failure to deduct TDS u/s 192 on LTC/LFC reimbursements relating to foreign travel. Tribunal noted that exemption u/s 10(5) applies only to travel within India, and the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the assessee’s own case had already clarified that foreign travel reimbursements are taxable salary. Assessee’s plea of reasonable cause based on interim High Court orders was rejected, as statutory obligation to deduct tax remained unchanged and pen...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930