Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Additional Commissioner of Income-tax Vs Shreyas Gramin Bank (Supreme Court of India)
Appeal Number : Civil Appeal No. 4801 OF 2007
Date of Judgement/Order : 12/09/2012
Related Assessment Year :
Sponsored

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Additional Commissioner of Income-tax

v/s.

Shreyas Gramin Bank

CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4801 OF 2007

SEPTEMBER 12, 2012

ORDER

Heard learned counsel on both sides.

We have gone through the Notice under Section 154 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [‘Act’, for short]. We find that the said notice is totally vague. The Assessing Officer has not even indicated as to on what basis he has allowed excess set-off. Notice under Section 154 of the Act, therefore, was not maintainable. The second notice under Section 148 of the Act was issued squarely on the basis of notice under Section 154 of the Act. In the circumstances, the High Court was right in setting aside both the notices. We, therefore, see no reason to interfere with the impugned order.

Accordingly, the civil appeal filed by the Department is dismissed with no order as to costs.

NF

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
February 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
2425262728