This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Notice u/s 148 based on vague notice u/s. 154 not maintainable -SC
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Additional Commissioner of Income-tax Vs Shreyas Gramin Bank (Supreme Court of India)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- Supreme Court of India
Advertisement
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Additional Commissioner of Income-tax
v/s.
Shreyas Gramin Bank
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4801 OF 2007
SEPTEMBER 12, 2012
ORDER
Heard learned counsel on both sides.
We have gone through the Notice under Section 154 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [‘Act’, for short]. We find that the said notice is totally vague. The Assessing Officer has not even indicated as to on what basis he has allowed excess set-off. Notice under Section 154 of the Act, therefore, was not maintainable. The second notice under Section 148 of the Act was issued squarely on the basis of...
