This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Non-compliance in respect of hived off part of project does not dis-entitle deduction under Section 80IB(10)
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Smt. Swapna Cherukuri Vs DCIT, Hyderabad (ITAT Hyderabad)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2008-09
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Hyderabad
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Brief of the case:
ITAT Hyderabad in the case of Smt. Cherkuri vs. DCIT concluded that development of commercial complex by the buyer of plot area even if it is approved by the concerned authorities as the part of the project, could not be said to have been developed by the assessee as a part & parcel of the project.
Facts of the case:
The assessee is engaged in the business of real estate development and claimed deduction of Rs. 3,29,78,844/- u/s Sec 80IB(10) in respect of profit derived from housing project developed by her.
The Assessing Officer during the course of scr...
Author Info
