Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ACIT (TDS) Vs St. Mary's Rubbers Private Limited (ITAT Cochin)
Related Assessment Year : 2011-12
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Reimbursement of expenses against separate bills to C&F agents doesn’t require TDS and hence no dis allowance u/s 40(a)(1a)… ITAT Cochin bench held in the case of Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (TDS) Vs St. Mary’s Rubbers Private Limited dismissing revenue’s appeal. Amounts paid by way of reimbursement of expenses do not constitute income in the hands of the recipient. Consequently, the payer is under no obligation to deduct TDS u/s 194C and no dis allowance of the expenditure can be made u/s 40(a)(ia). Full Text of ITAT Order is as follows:- This appeal fi...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930