Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Shri. Parswanath Padmarajaiah Jain Vs ACIT (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Shri. Parswanath Padmarajaiah Jain Vs ACIT (ITAT Bangalore) Conclusion: Assessee was not entitled to the benefit of section 54F in respect of the investment made by assessee in purchasing the capital asset (land) as the said purchase of land was not within a period of one year prior to the sale of capital asset or falling in any of the categories in which assessee was entitled to claim exemption u/s.54F. Held: AO denied assessee’s claim of deduction under section 54F on the reason that the new land was acquired by assessee before one year of sale of the capital asset i.e. 01.04.2012. It was ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

One Comment

  1. Prakash says:

    HI Sir.. I have a query that if the consideration received on sale of LTCA (being a land) invested in purchase of land is eligible for deduction under section 54F? Does “purchase of land” consider as “Investment in House Property” for the purpose of Section 54F? Please help me with answer.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930