Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Pravin Khetaramm Purohit Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Pravin Khetaramm Purohit Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) This case concerns additions made for alleged “on-money” cash payments towards purchase of a shop in Platinum Mall, a project developed by Rubberwala Group. Assessee purchased Shop No. 43 in October 2019 for ₹17.75 lakh, &  paid the entire amount through banking channels. Stamp duty was paid based on the higher market value determined by the Stamp Authority, indicating a fully disclosed transaction. During a search on Rubberwala Group, the department seized a pendrive containing excel sheets &  recorded statements of employees (not...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Reopening Fails on Both Counts: Invalid Sec 148A Notice and Time-Barred Sec 148 Render Assessment Void Coffee Income: Rule 7B Overrides Rule 7 – ITAT Remands for Segregation of Own vs Purchased Produce Duty Drawback Taxable Only on Receipt – ITAT Deletes Addition & U/s 270A Penalty Skill Development = “Education” – ITAT Allows Sec 11 Exemption to Charitable Trust No Penalty for Wrong Claim or Head of Income – ITAT Deletes Section 271(1)(c) Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930