Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Pravin Khetaramm Purohit Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Pravin Khetaramm Purohit Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) This case concerns additions made for alleged “on-money” cash payments towards purchase of a shop in Platinum Mall, a project developed by Rubberwala Group. Assessee purchased Shop No. 43 in October 2019 for ₹17.75 lakh, &  paid the entire amount through banking channels. Stamp duty was paid based on the higher market value determined by the Stamp Authority, indicating a fully disclosed transaction. During a search on Rubberwala Group, the department seized a pendrive containing excel sheets &  recorded statements of employees (not...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Bogus Supplier Tag Alone Not Enough: ITAT Deletes Purchase and Loan Additions No Specific Charge, No Penalty: Mumbai ITAT Cancels Section 270A Levy for Defective Notice Mere Investigation Wing Alert Is Not ‘Reason to Believe’: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Reopening Liquor Trader Gets Relief as ITAT Reduces GP Rate to 3.13% & Deletes Separate Expense Disallowance From Clean Chit to Crores in Penalty: SEBI Reopens Suzlon Case and Strikes Hard View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930