Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Rangbahar Vs CIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2005-06
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Rangbahar Vs Commissioner of Income Tax (ITAT Mumbai) In this case CIT (Commissioner of Income tax), disallowed depreciation on mobiles, as the assessee has not provided ‘the place of installation’ of Mobile Phones. Vide para 18 of the Revision Order of the CIT was of the opinion that the assessee has not provided “the place of installation of assets”, which in this case was of mobile phone was not given and therefore the claim of depreciation was not allowable. Mobile in itself means “able to move or be moved freely or easily.” As per Cambridge Dictionary Mobile means, “...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

Abhishek Raja Ram - Popularly known as "Revolutionary Raja" is FCA, DISA, Certificate Courses on – Valuation, Indirect Taxes , GST etc, M. Com (F&T) Mr. Abhishek Raja “Ram” is a Fellow member of ICAI, qualified in 2006, and holds Master’s-Degree in Commerce. He has more than a 15 ye View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Arbitrary Taxation vs Constitutional Protection: Understanding Articles 14, 19(1)(g) and 265 Penalty for Tax Evasion Under GST: When Intent Matters More Than Error Complexities of GST Departmental Audit: A Judicial Analysis Legal Boundaries of GST Demand Orders: Imperative of Notice Adherence Technological Innovations in GST Inspection and Seizure View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031