Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Rangbahar Vs CIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2005-06
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Rangbahar Vs Commissioner of Income Tax (ITAT Mumbai)

In this case CIT (Commissioner of Income tax), disallowed depreciation on mobiles, as the assessee has not provided ‘the place of installation’ of Mobile Phones. Vide para 18 of the Revision Order of the CIT was of the opinion that the assessee has not provided “the place of installation of assets”, which in this case was of mobile phone was not given and therefore the claim of depreciation was not allowable. Mobile in itself means “able to move or be moved freely or easily

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Author Bio

Abhishek Raja Ram - Popularly known as "Revolutionary Raja" is FCA, DISA, Certificate Courses on – Valuation, Indirect Taxes , GST etc, M. Com (F&T) Mr. Abhishek Raja “Ram” is a Fellow member of ICAI, qualified in 2006, and holds Master’s-Degree in Commerce. He has more than a 15 ye View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Search and Seizure: GST vs. Income Tax Key Differences Comprehensive Guide to Intra-State E-Way Bill Requirements in India Challenging Section 74 GST Notices: Key Grounds & Legal Precedents SC Scrutinizes GST Applicability on Joint Development Agreements: A Landmark Petition India’s Tobacco Industry: Rs 1 Lakh Penalty for Unregistered Packing Machines View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31