Material Seized from third party cannot be said to belonging to Assessee for mere mention of his name

DCIT Vs Esteem Textiles P. Ltd. (ITAT Delhi)

Where AO had framed assessment under section 153C against assessee on basis of a list unearthed pursuant to a search and seizure operation at the premises of a third party, containing name of assessee as an investor, the assessment order was quashed because the said document could not be said to be be

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.