Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Alka Khandaka Vs ITO (ITAT Jaipur)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Alka Khandaka Vs ITO (ITAT Jaipur) ITAT Jaipur deletes ₹44.61 lakh addition – Cash deposits during demonetization held as explained through recorded sales Assessee, proprietor of M/s Alka Gems, engaged in jewellery trade, filed ITR u/s 44AD declaring income of ₹12.53 lakh on sales of ₹80.54 lakh. During scrutiny, AO noticed cash deposits of ₹44.61 lakh in United Bank of India between 9.11.2016 & 30.12.2016 (demonetization period). AO held that Assessee failed to prove the genuineness of purchases & sales, as one of the suppliers, M/s Parijat International, was found non-exist...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Reopening Fails on Both Counts: Invalid Sec 148A Notice and Time-Barred Sec 148 Render Assessment Void Coffee Income: Rule 7B Overrides Rule 7 – ITAT Remands for Segregation of Own vs Purchased Produce Duty Drawback Taxable Only on Receipt – ITAT Deletes Addition & U/s 270A Penalty Skill Development = “Education” – ITAT Allows Sec 11 Exemption to Charitable Trust No Penalty for Wrong Claim or Head of Income – ITAT Deletes Section 271(1)(c) Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930