Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Ketkiben Samirbhai Jani Vs ITO (ITAT Rajkot)
Related Assessment Year : 2019-20
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Ketkiben Samirbhai Jani Vs ITO (ITAT Rajkot) ITAT Rajkot Trims ‘On-Money’ Addition – Only 8% Profit Element Taxable Instead of Entire Cash Component A search on Shivalik, Shilp & Sharda Group led to seizure of digital data from brokers Manish Brahmbhatt & Bhaumik Panchal. A Word file “Floris 32.docx” was found showing alleged on-money cash payment of ₹5,06,000 for purchase of units in “Sky City Floris.” Based on this, AO reopened the case u/s 147 &  treated ₹1,68,667 (⅓ share) as unexplained cash u/s 69A in the hands of Assessee, Ketkiben Samirbhai Jani, holdin...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Section 54F Deduction Allowed on Genuine House Purchase from In-Laws: Mumbai ITAT Pune ITAT Quashes Reassessment as Section 148A(b) & 148A(d) Reasons Differed Section 54 Relief Can’t Be Denied Merely Due to Section 50C Addition: Pune ITAT Delhi ITAT Deletes Penny Stock Addition; Suspicion Can’t Replace Evidence Section 54F Exemption Allowed on Sale of Redeveloped Flat: ITAT Mumbai View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031