Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Abdul Rehaman Vs PCIT (Karnataka High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Abdul Rehaman Vs PCIT (Karnataka High Court)

Karnataka HC allows condonation of delay for belated return due to son’s death — directs CPC to process ITR

The Petitioner, Abdul Rehaman, aged 55, resident of Mangaluru, filed this writ petition seeking to quash the rejection order dated 12.07.2023 passed u/s 119(2)(b) by the PCIT, Panaji, refusing to condone delay in filing his return of income for AY 2022-23, & prayed for a direction to the CPC, Bengaluru, to process his belated return filed on 29.12.2022.

It was undisputed that the Petitioner did not file his IT

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penalty Deleted After ITAT Quashes Quantum Addition Invalid Notice, Wrong Remand Report & PAN Errors: ITAT Orders Fresh Assessment Seized Papers Showing Cash Payment Treated as Credible Evidence ITAT Clarifies: Working Capital Adjustment May Nullify Interest Addition Disallowance Invalid as Negative Capital Stemmed from Non-Cash Adjustment View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
December 2025
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031