This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
ITAT Mumbai quashes Sections 271(1)(c) Penalty for Lack of Additions in Reassessment
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Archana Achyut Sail Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2017-18
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Mumbai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Archana Achyut Sail Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Mumbai Bench has set aside penalties imposed on Archana Achyut Sail, a retired Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited (MTNL) employee, for alleged income concealment and misreporting for the assessment years (AY) 2016-17 and 2017-18. The Tribunal’s decision, delivered on March 25, 2025, emphasizes the principle that no penalty should be levied if no additions are made to the income declared in response to a Section 148 notice, and highlights the discretionary nature of penalty imposition.
The case originated from ...






