Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Satish Kumar Pawa Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Satish Kumar Pawa Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) ITAT Delhi Quashes Mechanical 153D Approvals – Common Sanction for Multiple Assessees Held Void-  Rule 27 Invoked Successfully – Tribunal Allows Assessees to Raise Jurisdictional Plea ITAT Delhi has held that consolidated approval u/s 153D granted for multiple assessees & years through a single letter was mechanical & invalid. Consequently, the assessments framed pursuant to such approval were quashed, & penalty appeals under section 271(1)(c) also stood deleted. Assessees invoked Rule 27 of ITAT Rules to raise an additional legal ground ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Reopening Fails on Both Counts: Invalid Sec 148A Notice and Time-Barred Sec 148 Render Assessment Void Coffee Income: Rule 7B Overrides Rule 7 – ITAT Remands for Segregation of Own vs Purchased Produce Duty Drawback Taxable Only on Receipt – ITAT Deletes Addition & U/s 270A Penalty Skill Development = “Education” – ITAT Allows Sec 11 Exemption to Charitable Trust No Penalty for Wrong Claim or Head of Income – ITAT Deletes Section 271(1)(c) Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930