Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Thejaswini Jakkaraju Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2024-25
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Thejaswini Jakkaraju Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)

Assessee filed her original income tax return on 22.06.2024 under the old tax regime but inadvertently did not claim the rebate of ₹21,350 available u/s 87A. To rectify this omission, she submitted a revised return on 11.07.2024, claiming the rebate. However, the CPC, Bangalore processed the return u/s143(1) & denied the rebate.

Aggrieved by this denial,  Assessee first sought rectification u/s 154, but upon receiving no r

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Assessee proves identity & creditworthiness of lender: Upholds deletion of Addition Double addition on same property transaction: Bangalore ITAT remands matter to AO ITAT Quashes Reassessment for Non-Compliance with GKN Drive Shaft Judgment Loose Papers / dumb documents Lack Corroboration: ITAT Quashes Addition Accommodation Entry Addition Unsustainable Without Evidence: ITAT Delhi View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2025
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031