Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Instrumentarium Corporation Limited, Finland Vs. Assistant Director of Income Tax International Taxation (ITAT Kolkata)
Appeal Number : I.T.A. Nos.1548 and 1549/Kol/2009
Date of Judgement/Order : 15.07.2016
Related Assessment Year : 2003-04 & 2004-05
Courts : ITAT Kolkata
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Why this article-:

1. This article is based on a judicial pronouncement ITAT – KOLKATA SPECIAL BENCH ‘A’, KOLKATA vide its order dated July 15, 2016 in the case of Instrumentarium Corporation Limited, Finland v ADIT -International Taxation I Kolkata.

2. The bench has concluded that, in view of section 92C of the Income Tax Act 1961 related parties cannot have interest free loan transaction.

3. Apparently, the author is not in agreement with this conclusion. It is not necessary that all moratoriums or free services between associated enterprises must be compensated in terms of charging of fees / remuneration. It is always possible that there are other means of remunerating / compensating the moratoriums or free services.

4. The bench is of the opinion that “there is no concept like FREE LUNCH.”

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031