Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sai Shraddha Enterprises Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 1803/MUM/2020
Date of Judgement/Order : 29/12/2022
Related Assessment Year : 2011-12
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Sai Shraddha Enterprises Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)

ITAT Mumbai held that initiation of proceedings under section 153C of the Income Tax Act based on documents impounded during the course of survey under section 133A of the Income Tax Act is bad in law and unjustified as no such material were found during the course of search.

Facts- A search was carried out u/s. 132 of the Act and survey u/s. 133A of the Act was also carried out on 31st July, 2014 in Ameya Group of cases. The survey u/s. 133A of the Act was carried out and documents were impounded showing cash transactions belonging to the assessee.

On perusal of such impounded documents, it was seen that some of the papers belong to the assessee and having a bearing on the determination of total income of the assessee. The relevant assessment years were 2011-12 to 2014-15.

Accordingly, after recording the satisfaction note a notice u/s. 153C of the Act was issued on 30th September, 2015 by A.Y. 2009-10 to 2014-15. The assessee filed ROI u/s. 153C of the Act for all the years on 10th November, 2015 at ₹ nil. Subsequently, notice u/s. 143(2) of the Act was also issued and further notice u/s. 142(1) of the Act was also issued.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031