Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Shri Poonam K. Prajapati Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2009-10
Courts : ITAT Mumbai
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Shri Poonam K.Prajapati Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)

ITAT Mumbai held that penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act not imposable when the addition on account of bogus purchases is done on adhoc/ estimated basis. As, adhoc/ estimated based addition doesn’t tantamount to furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income.

Facts- Based on information from DGIT(Inv), AO re-opened the assessment alleging that assessee had obtained accommodation entries/ bogus purchases bill

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31