Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Shri Poonam K. Prajapati Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2009-10
Courts : ITAT Mumbai
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Shri Poonam K.Prajapati Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) ITAT Mumbai held that penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act not imposable when the addition on account of bogus purchases is done on adhoc/ estimated basis. As, adhoc/ estimated based addition doesn’t tantamount to furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income. Facts- Based on information from DGIT(Inv), AO re-opened the assessment alleging that assessee had obtained accommodation entries/ bogus purchases bills from 6 parties. Accordingly, AO made addition of Rs. 63,52,693/-. Subsequently, the AO has issued notice for levy of pena...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930