Case Law Details
Case Name : Haware Engineers & Builders Private Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2012-13
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Mumbai
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Haware Engineers & Builders Private Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
If a immovable property in the shape of flats / shops is held as stock-in-trade, then it becomes part of trading operations for the assessee and as a natural corollary, any income derived there-from would be Business Income and not Income from House Property.
FULL TEXT OF THE ITAT JUDGMENT
1. Aforesaid appeal by assessee for Assessment Year [AY] 2012-13 contest the order of Ld. Commissioner of Income-Tax (Appeals)-52 [CIT(A)], Mumbai, Appeal No.CIT(A)-52/DCIT-CC-4(2)/44/2015-16 dated 02/09/2016 by raising following ground of ap...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.


Correction: Last but one line from bottom- to be read , – ‘notional’ !
OFFHAND
4.3 Keeping in view the consistent stand of this Tribunal and respectfully following the same, we hold that if a immoveable property in the shape of flats / shops is held as stock-in-trade, then it becomes part of trading operations for the assessee and as a natural corollary, ANY INCOME DERIVED there-from WOULD BE Business Income and not Income from House Property. Resultantly, the impugned additions as confirmed by first appellate authority stand deleted. (FONT supplied)
Of course ;;as quite rightly said, if and when income is derived, that is on sale of the unsold stock, it would be assessable. and assessed as
business income,in the year of sale-Not until then !
courtesy
PS:: Until such sale, the developer- builder , in one’s conviction, in view of the governing law for Flats, might have to continue to hold the unsold Flats as st-in-trade. For that matter, he cannot even convert it into , and sell as, ‘capital asset’..
In any event, the question of taxing any national income cannot arise – Any thoughts to the contrary ?