Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Navin Sirahmal Mukim Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2008-09
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Navin Sirahmal Mukim Vs ITO (ITAT Pune) It is observed that the assessee allegedly purchased diamonds through the Hawala purchase bills and thereafter utilized the same in the manufacture of the jewellery. In such a situation, the entire amount of purchase bills does not requires addition but only the profit element because the diamonds must have been actually purchased at lower prices in lieu of which costly hawala purchases were recorded, which were used in the jewellery-making,. The Hon’ble jurisdictional High Court in Pr.CIT Vs. Paramshakti Distributors Pvt. Ltd., vide its judgment dated...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

One Comment

  1. Javri Golchha says:

    None of the officer of any states follows the Order of Other state HC. Various case laws are there which are infavour of genuine dealer but the attitude of Officers affect the bonafode dealer.Since 2013, Cheater business entities purposely doing such tactics to have % gain

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930