Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Govindbhai Atmaram Thakor Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Govindbhai Atmaram Thakor Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)

In the case of Govindbhai Atmaram Thakor vs. ITO, the ITAT Ahmedabad considered an appeal challenging the addition of ₹18,01,075 as unexplained income under Section 69A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The assessee, an agriculturist and long-time employee of Modern Denim Ltd., failed to respond to notices issued under Sections 139 and 142(1), leading to an ex-parte assessment under Section 144. The Assessing Officer (AO) observed substantial cash deposits in the assessee’s bank account during the demonetization period and m

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Author Bio

A Blogger by Passion and a Chartered Accountant by Profession. View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Demonetization cash deposits: ITAT Kolkata deletes Section 69A addition SC upholds validity of e-auction sale conducted by bank SC Interprets the word ‘May’ under Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881 Interim Compensation under Section 143A of NI Act Not mandatory: SC WhatsApp Messages Not Conclusive Evidence for Addition: ITAT Chennai View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31