This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Forgery should be proved by clear & cogent evidence: CESTAT sets aside Penalty
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Diamond Creations Vs C.C.-Mundra (CESTAT Ahmedabad)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All CESTAT, CESTAT Ahmedabad
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Diamond Creations Vs C.C.-Mundra (CESTAT Ahmedabad)
Coming to the contention of revenue regarding forgery of the textile committee report, we do not find any reason to go into the detail as the fact that reports were forged does not impact the classification assuming the reports relied upon by the department are the original one as was held in Sunrise Trader case (supra). Lastly personal penalty on the charge of forgery of Textile Committee report, Mumbai on Bajrang Sharma, Amit Momamya and Mahesh Bhanushali, have been imposed mainly on the basis of confessional statements of ...
