Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Kanaiya Food Products Vs. PCIT (ITAT Rajkot)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Kanaiya Food Products Vs. PCIT (ITAT Rajkot) No Second Guessing AO’s Judgment – ITAT Nullifies PCIT’s 263 Revision as Overreach- PCIT’s 263 Order Quashed – AO’s Enquiry on Cash Payments Found Adequate Assessee, a partnership firm engaged in manufacturing Urad Papad, filed appeal against revision order u/s 263 passed by PCIT, who held that the reassessment order u/s 147 r.w.s. 144B (dated 24.03.2022) was erroneous & prejudicial to Revenue because AO failed to disallow cash payments of ₹42.92 lakh allegedly violating Section 40A(3). Assessee’s Stand: The payments were made to...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Section 54F Deduction Allowed on Genuine House Purchase from In-Laws: Mumbai ITAT Pune ITAT Quashes Reassessment as Section 148A(b) & 148A(d) Reasons Differed Section 54 Relief Can’t Be Denied Merely Due to Section 50C Addition: Pune ITAT Delhi ITAT Deletes Penny Stock Addition; Suspicion Can’t Replace Evidence Section 54F Exemption Allowed on Sale of Redeveloped Flat: ITAT Mumbai View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031