Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Kanaiya Food Products Vs. PCIT (ITAT Rajkot)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Kanaiya Food Products Vs. PCIT (ITAT Rajkot)

No Second Guessing AO’s Judgment – ITAT Nullifies PCIT’s 263 Revision as Overreach- PCIT’s 263 Order Quashed – AO’s Enquiry on Cash Payments Found Adequate

Assessee, a partnership firm engaged in manufacturing Urad Papad, filed appeal against revision order u/s 263 passed by PCIT, who held that the reassessment order u/s 147 r.w.s. 144B (dated 24.03.2022) was erroneous & prejudicial to Revenue because AO failed to disallow cash payments of ₹42.92 lakh allegedly violating Section 40A(3).

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penalty Deleted After ITAT Quashes Quantum Addition Invalid Notice, Wrong Remand Report & PAN Errors: ITAT Orders Fresh Assessment Seized Papers Showing Cash Payment Treated as Credible Evidence ITAT Clarifies: Working Capital Adjustment May Nullify Interest Addition Disallowance Invalid as Negative Capital Stemmed from Non-Cash Adjustment View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
December 2025
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031