Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sonali Mahendra Naik Gaunekar Shivoham Vs ITO (ITAT Panaji)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sonali Mahendra Naik Gaunekar Shivoham Vs ITO (ITAT Panaji) FAC Order Set Aside for Ignoring Written Submissions- Failure to Record Reasons Vitiates NFAC Order- Natural Justice Violated: ITAT Panaji Quashes NFAC Order Passed Without Considering Assessee’s Documents Assessee challenged the NFAC order dt. 23/09/2025 passed u/s 250, which upheld reassessment made u/s 147 r.w.s. 263 determining income at ₹ 9.81 crores. The case stemmed from a reopening notice u/s 148 dt. 19/02/2020, where AO invoked s. 50C to tax difference between sale consideration & stamp-duty value. Though the PCIT had...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Section 54F Deduction Allowed on Genuine House Purchase from In-Laws: Mumbai ITAT Pune ITAT Quashes Reassessment as Section 148A(b) & 148A(d) Reasons Differed Section 54 Relief Can’t Be Denied Merely Due to Section 50C Addition: Pune ITAT Delhi ITAT Deletes Penny Stock Addition; Suspicion Can’t Replace Evidence Section 54F Exemption Allowed on Sale of Redeveloped Flat: ITAT Mumbai View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031