Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Delhi Police Welfare and Recreational Club Fund vs. CIT (ITAT Delhi)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 7653/Del/2018
Date of Judgement/Order : 28/06/2021
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

Delhi Police Welfare and Recreational Club Fund vs. CIT (ITAT Delhi)

We have gone through the record in the light of the submissions made on either side. Insofar as the nature of activity of promotion of  welfare and recreational activities of the police personnel, by its nature, is concerned, Ld. CIT(E) does not dispute whether it falls in the purposes of section 2(15) of the Act. Only objection is that the aims & objects of  standing order No. 270 of Commissioner of police, Delhi clearly establish that the primary objective of the appellant club is to provide benefit to its members of Delhi police personnel only and not to public at large or general public and, therefore, it violates the provisions of section 2 (15) of the Act. This is the sole basis for rejection of the request of the assessee for registration section 12A of the Act. Precisely this is the argument of the Ld. DR also.

 In AP Police Welfare Case (supra), Hon’ble Andhra Pradesh High  Court considered a similar question in the light of the decision reported  in Oppenheim vs. tobacco securities trust Co Ltd (1951) 1 All ER 16, IRC v. City of Glasgow Police Athletic Association (1953) 1 All ER 747 (HL), and Ahmedabad Rana Caste Association vs. CIT (1971) 82 ITR 704 (SC) and held that insofar as public employment is concerned and in particular the government formed by, for and of the people is the employer, even it is to be taken in a restrictive sense, and the employer is the representative of the public or the people -in the ultimate analysis, it is the public that is the employer; qui facit per alium facit per se, and so, to the service rendered by the employees in the public employment, the beneficiaries  are the public. On this test the court reached a conclusion that AP Police Welfare Association which is a charitable in its objects, as is quite apparent from the very objectives laid down under the rules framed thereunder, is a body that would constitute “a section of the public” and so, the fund founded for the benefit of such section should be treated as charitable in its object, attracting thereby the exemption from the exigibility to tax.

We accordingly, following the same, hold that the appellant, the Delhi Police Welfare And Recreational Club Fund is charitable in its objects and is a body that constitutes a section of the public, and so, the fund founded for the benefit of such section should be treated as charitable in its objects, attracting thereby the exemption from the exigibility to tax.


Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.


Author Bio

Mr.Kapil Goel B.Com(H) FCA LLB, Advocate Delhi High Court advocatekapilgoel@gmail.com, 9910272804 Mr Goel is a bachelor of commerce from Delhi University (2003) and is a Law Graduate from Merrut University (2006) and Fellow member of ICAI (Nov 2004). At present, he is practicing as an Advocate View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Section 148 Notice Invalid; Should Have Followed Faceless Regime: Section 151A Notes of account do form part of Balance Sheet: Supreme Court Bombay HC Quashes AY 2013-14 Notices Post 31-03-2021, Rules TOLA Not Applicable PCIT Central not competent authority u/s 12AB(1) to pass order on registration of Trust No Denial of Concessional Tax Rate Due to Technical Glitch on ITBA portal View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2024