Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Vijayaraghavan Sundararaman Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2022-23
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Vijayaraghavan Sundararaman Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore) Form 67 filed in time – yet two CIT(A)s couldn’t agree!- ITAT steps in to restore foreign tax peace- ITAT Bangalore directs AO to grant Foreign Tax Credit – Conflicting CIT(A) orders resolved in favour of Assessee Assessee, an individual, filed return for AY 2022-23 claiming foreign tax credit (FTC) of ₹54,093 u/s 90A in respect of tax paid in the UK. CPC while processing the return u/s 143(1) denied the claim. A rectification petition u/s 154 was also rejected on the same ground. Two separate appeals were thereafter filed before CIT(...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Section 68 Additions Fail: Documentary Evidence Cannot Be Ignored Without Enquiry Commission Disallowance Remanded – 133(6) Non-Response Not Sufficient; Ad-hoc Expenses Cut to 10% Stamp Duty vs Actual Value Dispute: ITAT Orders DVO Valuation ITAT Bangalore Remands ₹49L Sec 68 Addition & ₹3.74L TDS Disallowance for Fresh Verification Penalty U/s 272A(1)(d) Deleted: Reasonable Cause Subsequent Compliance Accepted View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930