Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Lalchand Narayan Bhakt Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2011-12
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

Lalchand Narayan Bhakt Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)

No Forfeiture, No Tax: Advance Can’t Be Income u/s 56(2)(ix), Section 51 Steps In When 56(2)(ix) Fails: Pune ITAT Relief

The Pune ITAT allowed the Assessee’s appeal and deleted the addition of ₹25 lakh treated as forfeited advance and taxed as “Income from other sources”. The case arose from a survey u/s 133APlease become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

IBC Section 7: SC Holds CIRP Admission Mandatory Once Debt & Default Proved; Society Intervention Denied ITAT Ahmedabad Deletes On-Money Additions; Loose Papers Insufficient Entire Bogus Purchase Disallowance Rejected When Books Not Rejected: ITAT Pune Appeal Cannot Be Dismissed for Typographical Error in Form 35: ITAT Hyderabad Agricultural Income Estimation Scaled Down: ITAT Rajkot Restricts Addition to ₹50,000 on Ad-hoc Basis View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
January 2026
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031