Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

No Fair Hearing, No Rejection – 80G Denial Without Show Cause Invalid

Case Law Details

TaxGuru Citation
2025 taxguru.in 7730
Case Name
Acharya Sri Tulsi Mahapragya Seva Kendra Charitable Trust Vs CIT (ITAT Bangalore)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Advertisement


Acharya Sri Tulsi Mahapragya Seva Kendra Charitable Trust Vs CIT (ITAT Bangalore)

No Fair Hearing, No Rejection – 80G Denial Without Show Cause Invalid- Violation of Natural Justice -Tribunal Restores 80G Application of Charitable Trust

The Trust, originally registered in 2000 (later renamed in 2009), holds registration u/s 12AB (from A.Y. 2022-23 to 2026-27). It was also granted provisional approval u/s 80G(5) from 23.03.2022 to A.Y. 2024-25. On 13.08.2024, the Trust applied for final approval u/s 80G(5) in Form 10AB. CIT(E) issued only one notice (30.11.2024), and thereafter rejected the application (25.02.2025) without issuing any final show cause.

CIT(E)’s Grounds for Rejection

  • Activities were allegedly not charitable, but in the nature of an AOP benefitting a set of associated persons.
  • Trust failed to provide details of buildings & nature of activities.
  • Concluded that activities carried on were not genuine charitable activities.

Assessee’s Arguments before ITAT

  • Only one hearing was granted; no proper opportunity was given.
  • CIT(E) erred in rejecting without issuing a show cause notice—violation of natural justice.
  • Trust fully satisfied the conditions u/s 80G(5) and already held 12AB registration & provisional 80G approval.
  • Filed additional evidences before ITAT (trust deed, 12AB registration, activity details, affidavits, etc.) seeking admission under Rule 29.

Tribunal’s Findings

  • Trust already enjoys 12AB registration & provisional 80G approval; thus genuineness cannot be doubted summarily.
  • CIT(E) should have verified documents & activities instead of rejecting outright.
  • Admission of additional evidence justified since assessee lacked opportunity earlier.
  • At approval stage u/s 80G, CIT(E) must only verify genuineness of activities & compliance of statutory conditions, not step into AO’s shoes to assess income.
  • Denial of proper opportunity by CIT(E) was a clear violation of natural justice.

Decision

  • Additional evidences admitted by Tribunal.
  • Entire issue remitted back to CIT(E) for fresh consideration in accordance with law.
  • CIT(E) directed to grant reasonable opportunity of hearing.
  • Assessee directed to fully cooperate & submit all documents.
  • Appeal partly allowed for statistical purposes

FULL TEXT OF THE ORDER OF ITAT BANGALORE

Paid content

Become a Basic or Premium Member, or log in if you are already a Basic or Premium member.

Advertisement

Author Info

CA Vijayakumar Shetty
Qualification: CA in Practice
Company: Shetty & Co, Chartered Accountants, Mangalore
Location: Mangalore, Karnataka
Articles Published: 6,104

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.