Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Krishnakumar Manda Vs DCIT (ITAT Hyderabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2021-22
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Krishnakumar Manda Vs DCIT (ITAT Hyderabad) Cash Deposits & Unexplained Investment Sink Assessee: Hyderabad ITAT Upholds Additions u/s 69/69A and Mandatory Penalty u/s 271AAC Hyderabad ITAT (Bench “A”) in Shri Krishnakumar Manda vs. DCIT, Circle-12(1), Hyderabad (ITA Nos.1016 & 1017/Hyd/2025, AY 2021-22, order dated 19.12.2025) dismissed both the quantum appeal and the penalty appeal of the assessee. In the quantum appeal, the Tribunal upheld addition of ₹38.02 lakh towards cash deposits, holding that the assessee failed to prove that the deposits were out of earlier withdrawals;...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Delay Condoned with Cost: ITAT Grants Fresh Chance, Slams Non-Compliance Section 153C Valid but Addition Fails: No Incriminating Material = No Deemed Dividend 870-Day Delay Not Condoned: ITAT Refuses Relief, Calls Out Negligence & “No Sufficient Cause” Wrong Section Claim Not Fatal: ITAT Remands Matter & Nullifies Penalty Penalty U/s 270A Quashed: No Specific Charge of “Misreporting” = No Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031