Case Law Details
Case Name : Neeta Chaudhary Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Bangalore
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Neeta Chaudhary Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Faceless AO Ignored Evidence of Family Funding – Tribunal Restores Justice for Homemaker- Addition u/s 69A for Unexplained Investment Deleted – Proof of Source from Son’s Bank Account Ignored by AO & CIT(A)
Assessee, an individual homemaker, had not filed her return for AY 2016-17. AO noticed that she purchased a residential flat worth ₹70.64 lakh during FY 2015-16. On enquiry u/s 133(6), the seller confirmed receipt of payments by cheques & TDS of ₹70,600 was deducted. Since Assessee failed to satisfactorily explain
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.


