Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Neeta Chaudhary Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

Neeta Chaudhary Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)

Faceless AO Ignored Evidence of Family Funding – Tribunal Restores Justice for Homemaker- Addition u/s 69A for Unexplained Investment Deleted – Proof of Source from Son’s Bank Account Ignored by AO & CIT(A)

Assessee, an individual homemaker, had not filed her return for AY 2016-17. AO noticed that she purchased a residential flat worth ₹70.64 lakh during FY 2015-16. On enquiry u/s 133(6), the seller confirmed receipt of payments by cheques & TDS of ₹70,600 was deducted. Since Assessee failed to satisfactorily explain

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
March 2026
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031