Case Law Details
Case Name : Kabir Mulchandani Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2000-01
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Mumbai
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Kabir Mulchandani Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Assessee, Kabir Mulchandani, had not filed his return for AY 2000-01 within time. AO completed assessment ex parte u/s 144 determining total income at ₹3.14 crore, making additions under various heads-salary, deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e), unexplained cash credits, unexplained expenditure, etc.
CIT(A) initially dismissed the appeal, but ITAT remanded the matter in 2007 for fresh consideration. Upon re-adjudication u/s 250 r.w.s. 254, CIT(A) partly allowed the appeal and sustained only: ₹23,21,000 as deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e); and ₹18,75,000 as un...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.


