Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Kabir Mulchandani Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2000-01
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Kabir Mulchandani Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) Assessee, Kabir Mulchandani, had not filed his return for AY 2000-01 within time. AO completed assessment ex parte u/s 144 determining total income at ₹3.14 crore, making additions under various heads-salary, deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e), unexplained cash credits, unexplained expenditure, etc. CIT(A) initially dismissed the appeal, but ITAT remanded the matter in 2007 for fresh consideration. Upon re-adjudication u/s 250 r.w.s. 254, CIT(A) partly allowed the appeal and sustained only: ₹23,21,000 as deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e); and ₹18,75,000 as un...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
March 2026
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031