Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Shri Kalyan Co-op Credit Society Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Appeal Number : ITA Nos. 398 & 399/Ahd/2020
Date of Judgement/Order : 05/08/2022
Related Assessment Year : 2014-15 & 2015-16
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Shri Kalyan Co-op Credit Society Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)

The assessee filed its return for the financial year under consideration on 25.08.2014 declaring total income at Rs. Nil after claiming deduction under Section 80P of the Income Tax Act, 1961 to the extent of Rs.22,45,102/-. The Assessing Officer observed that the assessee co-op society earns interest on funds which are invested with Banks as well as from its members but claimed deduction under Section 80P of the Act on the income including the entire interest income whereas Section 80P(2)(a)(i) implies that the deduction is available on profit & gains of business attributable to the activity of providing credit facilities to its members. Since the interest earned on FDR with SBI is not from its members, the Assessing Officer held that since the amount of Rs.10,09,672/- aroused on the funds invested in deposits with banks or in other securities, the said income falls in the category of “income from other sources” under Section 56 of the Act not eligible for deduction under Section 80P of the Act. Therefore, the Assessing Officer disallowed the assessee’s claim of deduction under Section 80P to the extent of Rs.10,09,672/-earned from FDR with SBI and treated the same as income from other sources under Section 56 of the Act.

ITAT held that if the claim of 80P has been rejected, income from FDRs are treated as income from other sources under Section 56 of the Act. The expenses related to the said interest income earned by the assessee has to be allowed which is permissible under the Statute of law. Therefore, we remand back this issue for examination to the file of the Assessing Officer to verify the proportionate expenditure and if it is just and proper then the same may be allowed. Needless to say the assessee be given opportunity of hearing by following principles of natural justice. Ground nos.3 & 4 are partly allowed for statistical purposes.

FULL TEXT OF THE ORDER OF ITAT AHMEDABAD

These two appeals are filed by the assessee against two separate orders dated 15.02.2020 & 19.02.020 passed by the CIT(A), Vadodara-5 for the Assessment Years 2014-15 & 2015-16 respectively.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031