This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Document seized must not only be a ‘speaking one’ but also be prima facie ‘incriminating one’ for attracting sec. 153C
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Sinhgad Technical Education Society Vs. ACIT (ITAT Pune)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2000- 01 to 2003- 04)
- Courts
- ITAT Pune
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Sinhgad Technical Education Society Vs. ACIT (ITAT Pune) -Though section 153C of the Income Tax Act confers jurisdiction if the Assessing Officer is ‘satisfied’ that ‘documents’ seized belong to a person other than the person referred to in section 153A so as to be able to assess that other person, the document must have prima facie incriminating information. The document seized must not only be a ‘speaking one’ but also be prima facie ‘incriminating one’ for attracting section 153C. If the impugned documents merely contain the notings of entr...
