Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Satish Chandra Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download. Already Upgraded? Login here to access.
Satish Chandra Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) The ITAT Delhi granted substantial relief to an assessee whose demonetization-period cash deposits of ₹80.92 lakh had been treated as unexplained money under Section 69A and taxed at the enhanced rate under Section 115BBE. The Tribunal observed that the assessee had produced material showing that the cash deposits originated from sales recorded in the books, although he failed to satisfactorily explain the sharp rise in cash sales immediately before demonetization. Balancing both sides, the Tribunal held that complete rejection of the assessee’s explanati...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

Ajay Kumar Agrawal FCA, a science graduate and fellow chartered accountant in practice for over 26 years. Ajay has been in continuous practice mainly in corporate consultancy, litigation in the field of Direct and Indirect laws, Regulatory Law, and commercial law beside the Auditing of corporate and View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Section 143(2) Assessment Quashed for Notice Issued by Officer Without Jurisdiction: ITAT Delhi Section 148 Reassessment Quashed as ₹50 Lakh Threshold Not Met for Same Transaction: ITAT Delhi Can Section 148A Reassessment Be Based Solely on Red-Flagged Information? No Capital Gains Without Transfer Under Development Agreement: ITAT Pune Section 148 Reassessment Quashed for Skipping Approved Section 148A(a) Inquiry: Chhattisgarh HC View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031