Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ACIT Vs Atul Properties (ITAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : I.T.A. Nos. 4393 & 4394/Mum/2018
Date of Judgement/Order : 30/06/2022
Related Assessment Year : 2010-11 & 2011-12
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

ACIT Vs Atul Properties (ITAT Mumbai)

Held that as the assessee had complied sufficiently the requirement of law as stipulated in section 80IB(10) of the Act and as per the said provision it was bound to complete the building project before 31.03.2012. Deduction u/s 80IB(10) allowed.

Facts-

The assessee firm filed original ROI declaring total income of Rs.29,75,430/- after claiming deduction u/s 80IB(10) of Rs. 23,561/-. The assessee filed revised return withdrawing its claim for deduction u/s 80IB(10) and offering total income Rs. 23,62,14,994/- for taxation.

AO completed scrutiny assessment based on original ROI and made addition of Rs. 23,32,39,561/- and Rs. 30,62,424/- made on account of disallowance of claim of deduction u/s. 80IB(10) and bogus purchases respectively.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031