Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : DCIT Vs Syama Reddy Mali Reddy (ITAT Hyderabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2019-20
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
DCIT Vs Syama Reddy Mali Reddy (ITAT Hyderabad) ITAT Hyderabad held that once it is proved that amount is invested towards purchase of new residential property then deduction under section 54F of the Income Tax Act cannot be denied merely because property got registered beyond stipulated period. Facts- During original assessment, AO declined the assessee’s claim for deduction under Section 54 of the Act on two grounds, viz. the assessee had not purchased the new residential house within two years from the date of transfer of the original asset; and the assessee owned more than one reside...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930