Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Syntel Private Limited Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-2019
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Syntel Private Limited Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) ITAT Mumbai Remands ₹33.83 Cr Disallowance: Schedule BP Claim Needs Fresh Verification; MAT Addition Also Set Aside In Syntel Private Limited vs. ACIT, Circle 11(2)(2), Mumbai (ITA No.6863/Mum/2025, AY 2018-19), the Mumbai ITAT “G” Bench partly allowed the Assessee’s appeal by setting aside the disallowance of ₹33.83 crore made u/s 37 and the corresponding addition to book profits u/s 115JB, and remanded the matter to the AO for de novo adjudication. The Assessee had claimed ₹33.83 crore under Schedule BP – “Any other amount allowabl...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Delay Condoned with Cost: ITAT Grants Fresh Chance, Slams Non-Compliance Section 153C Valid but Addition Fails: No Incriminating Material = No Deemed Dividend 870-Day Delay Not Condoned: ITAT Refuses Relief, Calls Out Negligence & “No Sufficient Cause” Wrong Section Claim Not Fatal: ITAT Remands Matter & Nullifies Penalty Penalty U/s 270A Quashed: No Specific Charge of “Misreporting” = No Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031